iOS

⌘K
  1. Home
  2. Docs
  3. iOS
  4. Architecture Pattern

Architecture Pattern

Architecture Patterns in iOS Development

When developing iOS applications, choosing the right architecture pattern is crucial for code organization, scalability, and maintainability. iOS developers commonly use different architectural patterns based on project complexity, team size, and app requirements.


1. Commonly Used iOS Architecture Patterns

ArchitectureDescriptionProsCons
MVC (Model-View-Controller)Apple’s default pattern, where View and Controller interact with ModelSimple, well-documented, and widely usedViewController often becomes overloaded (“Massive View Controller”)
MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel)ViewModel handles business logic, keeping ViewController lightweightImproves testability and separation of concernsRequires more setup and learning
MVP (Model-View-Presenter)Presenter handles UI logic, keeping View “dumb”Easier to unit test, better separationMore boilerplate code
VIPER (View-Interactor-Presenter-Entity-Router)Follows Clean Architecture with strict separation of concernsHighly scalable and testableComplex structure with many files
Clean ArchitectureFollows layered architecture (Entities, Use Cases, Interface Adapters, Frameworks)Best for large-scale apps, highly decoupledRequires significant planning and setup
TCA (The Composable Architecture)SwiftUI-focused architecture with Redux-like state managementBest for SwiftUI apps, strong testabilitySteeper learning curve

2. MVC (Model-View-Controller) – The Default Architecture

Overview:

  • Model → Handles data and business logic.
  • View → Displays UI elements.
  • Controller → Handles user interactions and updates the View.

Example of MVC:

// Model
struct User {
    let name: String
    let age: Int
}

// ViewController (Combines View + Controller)
class UserViewController: UIViewController {
    var user: User?

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        user = User(name: "John Doe", age: 25)
        print("User Name: \(user?.name ?? "")")
    }
}

Pros: Simple, Apple’s default, easy to implement.
Cons: ViewController becomes overloaded (“Massive View Controller”).


3. MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) – Improved Testability

Overview:

  • Model → Represents data and logic.
  • ViewModel → Handles business logic and prepares data for the View.
  • View (ViewController) → Displays UI and binds to ViewModel.

Example of MVVM:

// Model
struct User {
    let name: String
    let age: Int
}

// ViewModel
class UserViewModel {
    private let user: User
    
    var userName: String {
        return user.name
    }

    init(user: User) {
        self.user = user
    }
}

// ViewController (View)
class UserViewController: UIViewController {
    var viewModel: UserViewModel?

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        viewModel = UserViewModel(user: User(name: "Alice", age: 30))
        print("User Name: \(viewModel?.userName ?? "")")
    }
}

Pros: Improved separation of concerns, better testability.
Cons: Requires binding mechanisms (Combine, RxSwift, or closures).


4. MVP (Model-View-Presenter) – Makes Views “Dumb”

Overview:

  • Model → Handles data and logic.
  • Presenter → Manages business logic and updates the View.
  • View (ViewController) → Displays UI and gets data from Presenter.

Example of MVP:

// Model
struct User {
    let name: String
}

// View (Protocol for communication)
protocol UserView: AnyObject {
    func displayUserName(_ name: String)
}

// Presenter
class UserPresenter {
    private let user = User(name: "Charlie")
    weak var view: UserView?

    func loadUser() {
        view?.displayUserName(user.name)
    }
}

// ViewController (Implements UserView)
class UserViewController: UIViewController, UserView {
    var presenter: UserPresenter?

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        presenter = UserPresenter()
        presenter?.view = self
        presenter?.loadUser()
    }

    func displayUserName(_ name: String) {
        print("User Name: \(name)")
    }
}

Pros: Better separation, easier testing.
Cons: More boilerplate code.


5. VIPER (View-Interactor-Presenter-Entity-Router) – Clean & Scalable

Overview:

  • View → Displays UI.
  • Interactor → Handles business logic and data fetching.
  • Presenter → Converts data for the View.
  • Entity → Represents model objects.
  • Router → Handles navigation.

Example of VIPER:

// Entity
struct User {
    let name: String
}

// Interactor
class UserInteractor {
    func fetchUser() -> User {
        return User(name: "David")
    }
}

// Presenter
class UserPresenter {
    private let interactor = UserInteractor()
    weak var view: UserView?

    func loadUser() {
        let user = interactor.fetchUser()
        view?.displayUserName(user.name)
    }
}

// View (Protocol)
protocol UserView: AnyObject {
    func displayUserName(_ name: String)
}

// ViewController
class UserViewController: UIViewController, UserView {
    var presenter: UserPresenter?

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        presenter = UserPresenter()
        presenter?.view = self
        presenter?.loadUser()
    }

    func displayUserName(_ name: String) {
        print("User Name: \(name)")
    }
}

Pros: Best for large projects, strong separation of concerns.
Cons: More files, increased complexity.


6. Clean Architecture – The Most Modular Approach

Overview:

  • Entities → Business logic and domain models.
  • Use Cases → Business rules, interacting with entities.
  • Interface Adapters → Converts data for UI.
  • Frameworks & Drivers → UI and external systems (APIs, Databases).

Pros: Best maintainability, modular, highly scalable.
Cons: Requires a deep understanding and planning.


7. Choosing the Right Architecture

Project TypeRecommended Architecture
Small apps, prototypesMVC
Medium-sized appsMVVM or MVP
Large, scalable appsVIPER or Clean Architecture
SwiftUI projectsMVVM or TCA

8. Summary

✔️ MVC → Simple, but can lead to “Massive View Controllers.”
✔️ MVVM → Separates business logic, good for testability.
✔️ MVP → Improves UI logic separation, but needs extra setup.
✔️ VIPER → Best for enterprise apps, but complex.
✔️ Clean Architecture → Best modular approach, but requires planning.

Would you like to implement unit testing in these architectures, or need guidance on a specific pattern? 🚀

Articles